![]() ![]() I like this concept because despite the advantages a particular warrior might possess over another, the randomness of combat will ensure that even the presumably better warrior will lose at least a percentage of the time. At the end, we get a well choreographed fight between two re-enactors dressed in costume to simulate the potential outcome of such a contest, as well as a statistics model that determines the winner in 1,000 contests. A physician or medical specialist then examines the footage, or the dummy in some cases, and describes the type of trauma inflicted. The demonstrations are fascinating, including weapons experts that strike or fire their weapons at ballistics gel encased, and presumably reproduction skeletons. ![]() The arms and armors available to these warriors are demonstrated, both in their lethal potential or in their stopping power in the case of armor. What would happen if a medieval knight met up with a samurai? Who would be victorious in battle? The show then attempts to determine whom is the better warrior amongst two different kinds in history - in many cases two warriors that are separated by many centuries. I must first say about this series that the premise is outstanding, and one that has crossed my mind on numerous occasions. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |